Posted on 03/22/2013 14:21 PM (CNA Daily News)
â€œThe real problem is that immigration is a question about America â€“ about our national identity and destiny, about the national 'soul,'â€ the Archbishop of Los Angeles told the Jewish advocacy group AJC's event â€œBonds of Fellowship and Friendshipâ€ March 19.
â€œThe question for us is whatâ€™s our role in immigration reform, as religious people? ... I think our role is to be the voice of conscience and vision. Thatâ€™s whatâ€™s been missing in the debate so far.â€
During his remarks, the archbishop said that he himself is an immigrant â€“ a native of Monterrey, Mexico who did not move to the U.S. until after his college education.
Archbishop Gomez noted that the evening was an opportunity to deepen friendship between Catholics and Jews in Los Angeles, â€œdeepening the spiritual ties that unite us in truth, respect and goodness.â€
He said that the communities' joint mission is to make their city a place of love, truth and peace, and that immigration reform is among the most pressing issues faced by Los Angeles.
The archbishop expressed gladness that â€œfinallyâ€ there is movement on the issue, noting that at a meeting with religious leaders a couple weeks ago, President Obama â€œagreed with our concernsâ€ on immigration.
Immigration poses questions about America's identity, he said.
â€œWhat does it mean to be an American? Who are we as a people and where are we heading as a country? What will the â€œnext Americaâ€ look like? What should the next America look like?â€
Archbishop Gomez noted G. K. Chesterton's comment that the U.S. is the only nation founded not on a territory or shared race or ethnicity, but on a creed, on a vision.
The vision, he said, is Judeo-Christian, rooted in both the Old and New Testaments.
â€œAmericaâ€™s 'creed' is based on the biblical teaching that human life is sacred and has great dignity â€” because God made men and women in his own image. It gets expressed this way in the Declaration of Independence.â€
This belief has allowed a â€œflourishing diversity of cultures, religions and ways of life,â€ but increasing secularism, he said, â€œmakes it hard to talk about the values and commitments we find in Americaâ€™s founding documents.â€
America's founding principles â€“ that human rights come not from government but from God â€“ is what makes it even possible to talk about human rights and dignity, said Archbishop Gomez.
â€œSo if we are not allowed to talk about God anymore in our politics or civic life then it becomes very hard to talk about human rights and human dignity.â€
â€œAnd I think thatâ€™s one of the problems we are having in this immigration debate. We have lost sense of the 'humanity' of the men and women and children who are living in this country illegally.â€
He expressed concern that we are â€œlosing something of our national soulâ€ in how illegal immigration is addressed.
â€œThis great nation finds itself today reduced to addressing this major issue in our public life through: name calling and discrimination; criminal 'profiling' based on race; random identity checks; violent raids of workplaces and homes; arbitrary detentions and deportations.â€
A quarter of persons deported from the U.S. are from intact families, he said. â€œIn the name of enforcing our laws, now we are breaking up families.â€
Last year, 400,000 persons were deported, the archbishop noted. That means that last year, 100,000 families were rent apart in the name of American law.
â€œThese are not statistics, these are souls. Human beings. Weâ€™re talking about fathers and husbands who, with no warning, wonâ€™t be coming home for dinner tonight â€“ and who may not see their families again for a decade at least. We are talking about a government policy that punishes children for the crimes of their parents.â€
Archbishop Gomez called the nation to be â€œa better people than this.â€ He said America must be a place of both justice and law, as well as compassion and common sense.
â€œWhat weâ€™re doing right now betrays our values and makes our country weaker and more vulnerable.â€
Jews and Christians are called to be mindful of the strangers among us â€œfor you were strangers in the land of Egypt,â€ God told the Hebrews in Exodus.
Archbishop Gomez said that is â€œwhat our society needs to hear right now...We need to help our brothers and sisters to remember the founding vision of America. The vision of the Bible.â€
He said Jews and Christians must communicate this vision, in which the human person is made in the image of God. We must be â€œthe people who remember and believe â€“ that in Godâ€™s eyes weâ€™re all his beloved sons and daughters.â€
Even though in â€œour agitated political climateâ€ this sounds â€œnaÃ¯ve,â€ he said this is â€œno time for polite silence about our values. Too much is at stake to give in to the corrosive cynicism that masks itself as political 'realism.'â€
â€œWe need to remind our neighbors,â€ Archbishop Gomez concluded, that America was was founded on the vision â€œthat nobody ever forfeits his humanity or his right to be treated with dignity. No matter where he comes from or how he got here.â€
â€œNo matter what kind of papers he possesses or doesnâ€™t possess. This is as fundamental to the Bill of Rights as it is and the Torah or the Sermon on the Mount.â€
Posted on 03/22/2013 11:21 AM (CNA Daily News)
Miguel Woites, who works directly with the Bishopsâ€™ Conference of Argentina, the Archdiocese of Buenos Aires and the Apostolic Nunciature, dismissed statementes made by Sergio Rubin, the author of an interview with Cardinal Bergoglio entitled â€œOver Heaven and Earth.â€
Since Pope Francisâ€™ election on March 13, media reports have circulated Rubinâ€™s claim that the future Pope had supported homosexual unions as a possible political compromise in Argentinia. Rubin has been the only source used by the media for this claim.
In an article for the Argentinean newspaper Clarin, published on March 14, the day after Pope Francisâ€™ election, Rubin wrote, â€œWhen debate on the gay marriage bill began in the country, Bergoglio proposed that the bishops adopt a moderate position and perhaps leave room for civil unions as a compromise.â€
Days later, Rubin told the Associated Press that when Cardinal Bergoglio realized that same-sex marriage might be legalized, he suggested the Church support civil unions, a position that, according to Rubin, was rejected by the bishops.
Woites told CNA that Rubinâ€™s statements about the future Pope Francis â€œare not true, they are totally inaccurate.â€
â€œHe never said who said it and when. Itâ€™s wrong to invent something like this out of thin air.Â That article was severely criticized by the bishops. He probably was referring to (heterosexual) domestic partnerships, but not that anything be legalized,â€ Woites said.
He underscored that what Rubin said in his article â€œis an incorrect statement.â€
In a letter to the Carmelite nuns of Buenos Aires on July 8, 2010, when the debate on homosexual marriage in the country was in full swing, then-Cardinal Bergoglio wrote, â€œLetâ€™s not be naÃ¯ve:Â This is a not simple political struggle, but an attempt to destroy God's plan. It is not just a bill but a move of the Father of Lies, who seeks to confuse and deceive the children of God.â€
Posted on 03/22/2013 07:50 AM (CNA Daily News)
â€œFighting poverty, both material and spiritual, building peace and constructing bridges: these, as it were, are the reference points for a journey that I want to invite each of the countries here represented to take up,â€ Pope Francis said March 22.
The Pope met this morning in the Regia Hall of the Apostolic Palace with representatives from the more than 180 countries, sovereign orders and international organizations that have formal relations with the Vatican.
After a message of welcome and thanks from Ambassador Jean-Claude Michel, the dean of the diplomatic corps, Pope Francis offered his thoughts on the meeting and the Churchâ€™s engagement with the world.
This is â€œa simple yet deeply felt ceremony that somehow seeks to express the Popeâ€™s embrace of the world. Through you, indeed, I encounter your peoples, and thus in a sense I can reach out to every one of your fellow citizens, with their joys, their troubles, their expectations, their desires,â€ he said.
He also highlighted some of the reasons why he chose the name Francis, including his love and care for the poor, work that he noted Christians are engaged in throughout the world.
â€œBut there is another form of poverty!â€ he told the diplomats.
â€œIt is the spiritual poverty of our time, which afflicts the so-called richer countries particularly seriously.
â€œIt is what my much-loved predecessor, Benedict XVI, called the â€˜tyranny of relativism,â€™ which makes everyone his own criterion and endangers the coexistence of peoples,â€ he said.
The second reason that he chose Francis, the Pope recalled, is that the saint worked to build peace.
â€œBut there is no true peace without truth!â€ he stressed.
â€œThere cannot be true peace if everyone is his own criterion, if everyone can always claim exclusively his own rights, without at the same time caring for the good of others, of everyone, on the basis of the nature that unites every human being on this earth.â€
Pope Francis noted that one of his titles is â€œpontiff, that is, a builder of bridges with God and between people.â€
â€œMy own origins,â€ he explained, â€œimpel me to work for the building of bridges. As you know, my family is of Italian origin; and so this dialogue between places and cultures a great distance apart matters greatly to me.â€
And the growing interconnectedness and interdependence of the world makes the need for â€œreal spaces of authentic fraternityâ€ more important as well, he said.
Pope Francis underscored that building real brotherhood requires the contributions of faith, since it is â€œnot possible to build bridges between people while forgetting God.â€
â€œBut the converse is also true: it is not possible to establish true links with God, while ignoring other people,â€ he added.
For this reason, the Pope told the ambassadors it is â€œimportant to intensify dialogue among the various religionsâ€ and that he is â€œthinking particularly of dialogue with Islamâ€ and â€œnon-believers.â€
Pope Francis acknowledged that â€œfighting poverty, both material and spiritual, building peace and constructing bridgesâ€ will be â€œdifficult if we do not learn to grow in love for this world of ours,â€ which involves both people and the environment.
â€œHere too, it helps me to think of the name of Francis, who teaches us profound respect for the whole of creation and the protection of our environment, which all too often, instead of using for the good, we exploit greedily, to one anotherâ€™s detriment,â€ he said.
After delivering his address, Pope Francis individually greeted the diplomats, some of whom were accompanied by their wives.
On Saturday, Pope Francis will take a helicopter to meet with Benedict XVI at Castel Gandolfo around noon. His first Holy Week as Pope will begin the following day with the celebration of Palm Sunday Mass at St. Peterâ€™s Basilica.
Posted on 03/22/2013 06:00 AM (CNA Daily News)
The New Mexico native has won more medals than Michael Phelps, was voted homecoming king by the largest margin of votes in his high schoolâ€™s history, is a college graduate and owns the â€œworldâ€™s friendliest restaurant,â€ Timâ€™s Place, in Albuquerque.
Although Harris was born with Down syndrome, his life has been defined by his dreams, not his disability.
â€œMy inspiration,â€ Harris told CNA March 21, â€œis that I have wanted to open a restaurant since I was a kid.â€
With the help of his family, Harris was able to realize that goal in 2010 when he opened Timâ€™s Place, a restaurant that serves breakfast, lunch and hugs.
â€œThe best part is the hugs and all the love that comes with those hugs,â€ Harris said.
According to his digital hug counter that hangs on the wall, Harris has given away over 33,000 of them so far.
â€œI want people to feel comfortable and (give them) something awesome to have when they go home,â€ Harris explained. â€œTheyâ€™ll give a hug to their people in their hometown â€¦ then they can send a hug around the state.â€
Harrisâ€™ older brother, Dan, works as the operations manager while his father, Keith, helps with the â€œbusiness sideâ€ of the restaurant. His mother, Jeannie, helped put up the pictures from Harrisâ€™ life which adorn a wall under the words, â€œIâ€™m more like you than different.â€
In the over two years that Timâ€™s Place has been in business, Harris has been featured on local news channels, NPR, People Magazine and NBCâ€™s Today Show, to name a few. The media attention has brought in even more loyal patrons.
â€œI feel really happy when Iâ€™m with my customers and theyâ€™re just so happy for me,â€ Harris said.
Harrisâ€™ restaurant also helps support Special Olympics of New Mexico and the National Down Syndrome Congress.
â€œWe support the Special Olympics because they do a lot for us,â€ he said.
While some of his favorite events are basketball, hockey, track and field and golf, Harris â€“ a Special Olympic athlete and medal winner â€“ has already begun training for volleyball.
Harris has three brothers, each of whom is a â€œsuperhero,â€ he said.
Posted on 03/22/2013 04:00 AM (CNA Daily News)
â€œThis is great news for us...we're first of all very grateful,â€ said Abbot Justin Brown of the Covington-based Saint Joseph Abbey.
â€œWe noted that the news came to us the day after the feast of St. Joseph, so we felt that we certainly had a friend and an intercessor in St. Joseph throughout these years we've been involved in this case,â€ he told CNA March 21.
The Abbey was forced to file a suit against the members of the Louisiana State Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors, who claimed the sale of caskets within the state could only be done by a state-licensed funeral director at a funeral home.
Wednesday's ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirms the decision of a lower court that the funeral directors' policy denied the monks' rights to equal protection and due process.
â€œWe have felt very much vindicated...we felt from the very beginning that we were being denied our constitutional rights with this law, that said we could not sell our caskets in Louisiana.â€
â€œWe could sell them outside Louisiana, but we couldn't sell them inside Louisiana.â€
The abbey started its casket program on All Saints Day, 2007. It had previously received income from its timberland, but it had been wiped out by Hurricane Katrina and â€œthe Abbey began looking for other revenue sources,â€ the appeal court's decision explained.
The month after their casket business began, the Louisiana embalmers board â€œordered the Abbey not to sell caskets to the public.â€
The court wrote that the State Board's rule granting funeral directors a monopoly on Louisiana casket sales â€œadds nothing to protect consumers and puts them at a greater risk of abuse including exploitative prices.â€
The simple wooden caskets made by the monks are sold at prices â€œsignificantly lower than those offered by funeral homes.â€
â€œThe funeral directors have offered no rational basis for their challenged rule and, try as we are required to do, we can suppose none,â€ the court concluded.
The case may go to the Supreme Court, as the Fifth Circuit's decision is at odds with the Tenth Circuit's 2004 decision upholding a similar law in Oklahoma.
Abbot Brown said the decision â€œis helping us certainly support our ministry and life here at St. Joseph Abbey, and it means a lot also to those who purchase our caskets for their loved ones.â€
St. Joseph Abbey is nearly 125 years old, and operates a college seminary that serves dioceses in the South. It also has a retreat center, and a bakery that provides bread twice a week for New Orleans' poor, in addition to their casket business.
The caskets have â€œgood craftmanship,â€ Abbot Brown noted. â€œThey're very simple but very well done.â€
â€œWe feel that not only for us but for others, this is a victory for economic liberty. Especially for small businesses, that run against these kinds of regulations, and we hope this victory can help others.â€
Posted on 03/22/2013 02:04 AM (CNA Daily News)
â€œTo date, the State Departmentâ€™s posture on this case has been woefully inadequate, especially given that the life of an American citizen hangs in the balance,â€ their March 20 letter said.
â€œBoth the European Union and the United Nations special rapporteur on human rights in Iran have advocated publicly for Pastor Saeed â€“ the same cannot be said of this administration.â€
Those who signed the letter to Secretary of State John Kerry included Rep. Frank Wolf (R-Va.), co-chair of the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission of the House Committee of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
The letter charged that the absence of State Department testimony at a recent hearing â€œsent a dangerous messageâ€ that â€œeven human rights that compromise the safety and security of American citizens will be met with virtual silence from the U.S. government.â€
Pastor Abedini is serving an eight-year sentence in Iranâ€™s harsh Evin Prison. He converted to Christianity from Islam 13 years ago and had worked with house churches in Iran until attracting government opposition. In 2009, he agreed to stop working with house churches and he began work in non-religious orphanages.
He was arrested in September 2012 on charges that his earlier work with house churches posed a threat to national security.
The pastor has been a U.S. citizen since 2010, following his marriage to his American wife. He has the support of legal groups like the European Centre for Law and Justice and the American Center of Law and Justice, which have helped collect nearly 450,000 petition signatures in support of Abedini.
In a February letter, the pastor reported that in prison he has suffered physical violence, psychological abuse, death threats and declining health.
Last week the Tom Lantos Human Rights commission held a hearing about religious freedom abuses in Iran with a specific focus on the Abedini case. The State Department said no one was available to testify.
â€œThere was a palpable sense of disappointment in the room that our government didnâ€™t deem the hearing important enough to provide a witness,â€ said the congressmenâ€™s letter.
State Department officials met with Rep. Wolfâ€™s staff and Abediniâ€™s wife and her legal counsel later that day. Wolf said these officials would have made suitable witnesses for the hearing.
Reps. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.), Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), Robert Aderholt (R-Ala.), Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho) and Chris Smith (R-N.J.) also signed the letter.
They charged that the State Department â€œmisledâ€ the commission. They urged Kerry to issue a public statement advocating Pastor Abediniâ€™s â€œimmediate and unconditional releaseâ€ and to use the full resources of the U.S. government to free the pastor.
The congress members said an earlier State Department statement that expressed disappointment at Abediniâ€™s sentence failed to convey â€œan appropriate sense of urgency.â€
They also backed a proposal to create a special envoy at the U.S. State Department to advocate on behalf of religious minorities in the Middle East and South Central Asia. In the last congressional session, the proposal passed in the House but failed to advance in the Senate Foreign Relations committee, which Kerry headed at the time.
Rep. Wolf earlier this month released a report on the persecution of Christians, Jews and other religious minorities in the Middle East and south central Asia that lamented that persecution was causing a Christian exodus from the Middle East.
Posted on 03/21/2013 19:12 PM (CNA Daily News)
â€œThe identity of the person or group having the religious freedom objection should not matter; what should matter instead is whether the person or group faces government coercion to violate conscience,â€ said a document filed on behalf of the U.S. bishops.
â€œReligious freedom is for all who face this threat, not just some,â€ the March 20 statement declared.Â
The document was written by Anthony R. Picarello and Michael F. Moses, lawyers for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. Responding to a government comment period, it offers feedback on a proposed change to the federal contraception mandate.
â€œWe are willing, now as always, to work with the Administration to reach a just and lawful resolution of these issues,â€ the lawyers said. â€œIn the meantime, along with others, we will continue to look for resolution of these issues in Congress and in the courts.â€
Issued under the authority of the Affordable Care Act, the mandate requires nearly all employers to offer insurance plans coveringÂ abortion-inducing drugs, contraceptives and sterilization, even if providing those products violates their deeply-held religious beliefs.
While a small number of religious exemptions were included in the original mandate â€“ mainly to houses of worship â€“ the vast majority of religious organizations were bound by its requirements.
The mandate has come under fire by the U.S. bishops and scores of other religious leaders, who criticize the regulation for violating their constitutional right to religious freedom. More than 100 plaintiffs across the country have filed lawsuits challenging the mandate.
In response to the wave of protests, the Obama administration proposed an â€œaccommodationâ€ under which the objectionable coverage would be offered for free to employees of religious organizations that oppose the mandate.
The administration said this coverage can be offered for free because the cost of the contraceptives would be offset by the â€œtremendous health benefitsâ€ that women enjoy from using contraception, along with the fewer childbirths that will result.
Critics have voiced doubt over these claims, arguing that the coverage will ultimately be funded through the premium payments of the objecting religious groups.
The bishopsâ€™ comments enumerated a number of problems with the proposed update to the regulations.
First, the document explained, the suggested alteration â€œmakes no change in the underlying mandateâ€ and still requires coverage of contraceptives, sterilizations and abortion-causing drugs.
â€œThese are items and procedures that, unlike other mandated â€˜preventive services,â€™ do not prevent disease,â€ it stated.
Furthermore, the suggested change â€œoffers no exemption or accommodation of any kind whatsoeverâ€ to for-profit businesses, secular non-profits and individual business owners who believe the coverage to be immoral, nor does it allow individuals who do not wish to have such coverage to refuse it when they enroll.
Additionally, while the mandateâ€™s language defining â€œreligious institutionsâ€ has improved, the statement explained, â€œit continues to be highly objectionableâ€ by treating religiously-affiliated charities, schools, hospitals and institutions as having â€œsecondary religious importanceâ€ to houses of worship.
In discussing the mandate, the bishops have voiced serious concern over the language it uses to discuss religious institutions and activities, implying that soup kitchens, hospitals and other religious charities are deserving of a lesser degree of religious freedom than churches, temples and synagogues.
The comments stated that â€œjust as religion is not limited to worship, the freedom of religion is not limited to the freedom of worship. Religious freedom must also include the freedom to abide by Church teachings, even outside the four walls of the sanctuary.â€
Even non-profit religious institutions that fall under the accommodation will not be relieved of the â€œburden on religious liberty that the mandate creates,â€ the bishopsâ€™ statement explained. Since funds paid by the employer for other services can be used to pay for the objectionable products, â€œthere still seems to be a funding tie between the employer and the objectionable coverage.â€
In addition, there is no accommodation for self-insured plans, it noted.
For these reasons, the mandate breaks a number of federal laws, in addition to the U.S. Constitution, the bishopsâ€™ document said.
â€œAs applied to individuals and organizations with a religious objection to contraceptive coverage, the mandate violates the First Amendment, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act,â€ it stressed.Â
Posted on 03/21/2013 18:08 PM (CNA Daily News)
In a statement published on the official website of the Jesuit order in Germany, Father Francisco Jalics said that while he once believed his 1976 kidnapping was due to a denunciation by then-Father Bergoglio, he realized some 20 years ago that this belief was incorrect.
Following the election of Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio to the papacy on March 13, several media reports attempted to connect the new Pontiff to the Argentine dictatorship of Rafael Videla. At the time of the dictatorship, Fr. Bergoglio had been provincial of the Jesuits in Argentina.
Father Jalics â€“ who is now retired in Germany â€“ issued a statement sending his best wishes to the new Pope and offering assurances that the two are on good terms.
The 86-year-old priest said that his earlier statements were misinterpreted by the media. He adamantly denied that then-Father Bergoglio played any role in causing his five year-long captivity alongside another priest, Father Orlando Yorio, who died in 2000.
â€œSince my statement on March 15 of this year, I have received many questions, so I would like to add the following. I almost feel obliged to do so, because some commentaries contradict what I wanted to say,â€ Fr. Jalics said.
â€œThese are the facts: Neither I nor Orlando Yorio or were denounced by Father Bergoglio.â€
â€œAs I made clear in my previous statement, we were arrested because of a catechist who worked with us first and later joined the guerilla,â€ he explained.
â€œFor nine months we never saw her again, but two or three days after she was detained, we were detained as well,â€ he continued. â€œThe official who interrogated me asked for my papers. When he saw that I was born in Budapest, he thought I was a Russian spy.â€
â€œIn the Argentinean Jesuit congregation and in Catholic circles, false information spread in the years prior that claimed we had moved to the poor barrios because we belonged to the guerilla. But that was not the case. I suppose these rumors were motivated by the fact that we were not immediately released,â€ Fr. Jalics said.
â€œI was once inclined to think that we were the victims of a betrayal. But at the end of the 1990s, I realized after many conversations that this assumption was baseless,â€ the priest explained.
â€œFor this reason, it is wrong to assert that our capture happened because of Father Bergoglio,â€ he declared.
Posted on 03/21/2013 14:01 PM (CNA Daily News)
Around 1:30 p.m. local time on March 18, Daniel Del Regno, the kiosk ownerâ€™s son, answered the phone and heard a voice say, â€œHi Daniel, itâ€™s Cardinal Jorge.â€
He thought that maybe a friend who knew that theÂ former Archbishop of Buenos Aires bought the newspaper from them every day was pulling a prank on him.
â€œSeriously, itâ€™s Jorge Bergoglio, Iâ€™m calling you from Rome,â€ the Pope insisted.
â€œI was in shock, I broke down in tears and didnâ€™t know what to say,â€ Del Regno told the Argentinean daily La Nacion. â€œHe thanked me for delivering the paper all this time and sent best wishes to my family.â€
Del Regno shared that when Cardinal Bergoglio left for Rome for the conclave, he asked him if he thought he would be elected Pope.Â
â€œHe answered me, â€˜That is too hot to touch. See you in 20 days, keep delivering the paper.â€™ And the rest is, well, history,â€ he said.
â€œI told him to take care and that I would miss him,â€ Del Regno continued. â€œI asked him if there would ever be the chance to see him here again. He said that for the time being that would be very difficult, but that he would always be with us.â€
Before hanging up the phone, he added, the Pope asked him for his prayers.
Danielâ€™s father, Luis Del Regno, said they delivered the paper to the former cardinalâ€™s residence every day.
On Sundays, he said, the cardinal â€œwould come by the kiosk at 5:30 a.m. and buy La Nacion. He would chat with us for a few minutes and then take the bus to Lugano, where he would serve mate (tea) to young people and the sick.â€
Among the â€œthousands of anecdotesâ€ the elder Del Regno remembers is one involving the rubber bands that he put around the newspapers to keep them from being blown away when they were delivered to the cardinal.
â€œAt the end of the month, he always brought them back to me. All 30 of them!â€Â
He said he gets goose bumps whenever he thinks about Pope Francisâ€™ simplicity.
â€œIn June he baptized my grandson, it was an amazing feeling,â€ Del Regno said. â€œI know what heâ€™s like. Heâ€™s one of a kind.â€
Posted on 03/21/2013 11:33 AM (CNA Daily News)
On March 28, Holy Thursday, Pope Francis will celebrate the Chrism Mass in St. Peterâ€™s Basilica in the morning, but then go to the Casal del Marmo youth detention center rather than the Basilica of St. John Lateran.
This tradition is one that new pontiff has practiced since his days as Archbishop of Buenos Aires.
During that time, then-Cardinal Bergoglio would celebrate Holy Thursday Mass in a hospital, prison or shelter for the poor.
Images of the then-Cardinal washing and kissing the feet of AIDS patients and mothers with children began circulating the internet shortly following his election.
In a March 16 address to the media, Pope Francis confirmed that he chose his name after Saint Francis of Assisi after a friend urged him â€œnot to forget the poorâ€ when congratulating him on his election.
â€œOh how I would like a poor Church and for the poor!â€ Pope Francis remarked.
The Holy Thursday Mass is defined by Christâ€™s commandment to love and his humble gesture of washing his disciplesâ€™ feet.
The Office of Liturgical Celebrations has confirmed that other Holy Week celebrations will be held according to tradition.
In 2007, Benedict XVI visited the same youth detention center to celebrate Mass in the Chapel of the Merciful Father.